New and Improved

January 17, 2007 | 58 Comments

Welcome to the new Good Egg Gazette. I’m going to be rolling out some new features in the coming days and weeks and I think you’ll like the additions. I’m hosting the blog myself now (no more Blogger and Google to deal with) so if there’s any feature you’d like to see added just let me know.

More to come…


Comments

58 Comments so far

    Anon on January 19, 2007 5:28 pm
  1. sweet.

  2. Anonymous on January 19, 2007 5:29 pm
  3. weak

  4. Someone on January 19, 2007 5:39 pm
  5. Great. Now I have to changr my favorites again. Geez. A little warning would have been nice.

    Oh yeah… Since your still tweaking this site, it needs more color.

  6. Anonymous on January 19, 2007 5:56 pm
  7. I mean you think it’s bad a pair of women are coming in from defunct lives a high school student who knows about as much as I do about the law is blogging, but an almost 30 year old who is a ticket scalper and is spending his money on a website for a blog that is not really serving a purpose come on.

  8. Nate on January 19, 2007 6:30 pm
  9. Does anybody want to translate this for me?

  10. Anonymous on January 19, 2007 6:42 pm
  11. seems pretty straightforward to me…

  12. Nate on January 19, 2007 6:51 pm
  13. Is it missing some punctuation? Maybe that would clear it up for me.

  14. Anonymous on January 19, 2007 7:02 pm
  15. put it in and repost it then. sheesh

  16. Anonymous on January 19, 2007 9:06 pm
  17. Ok. I don’t like how the comments appear. Is there any way to seperate them into boxes or put lines between them or something?

  18. Nate on January 19, 2007 9:10 pm
  19. I don’t like how any of it’s looking right now.

  20. Nate on January 19, 2007 10:36 pm
  21. What?

  22. ec on January 19, 2007 10:48 pm
  23. Are you sure this new and improved blog was a good thing? It doesn’t seem to be starting out very well.

  24. Nate on January 19, 2007 10:51 pm
  25. tell me about it

  26. Anonymous on January 19, 2007 10:54 pm
  27. possibly u can sell something worthwhile on here like merchandise, tickets, porn, and more

  28. Someone on January 19, 2007 10:54 pm
  29. I like the comment seperation but not the numbers… or how the names are but it is better than it was. Keep on tweaking!

  30. Someone on January 19, 2007 10:55 pm
  31. PORN??? What the hell…?

  32. Anonymous on January 19, 2007 10:56 pm
  33. i like the numbers

  34. Anonymous on January 19, 2007 10:57 pm
  35. Carol Lurver.

  36. ec on January 19, 2007 11:04 pm
  37. This post is becoming very random! Why are so many people home blogging on friday night?

  38. anonymous on January 20, 2007 8:58 am
  39. So, does this mean you are gonna update more often?

  40. anonymous on January 20, 2007 9:00 am
  41. Oh, and do you get the email address when we enter it or is it lost in oblivion? Just curious.

  42. Nate on January 20, 2007 9:04 am
  43. If you enter an email address I’ll get it, but it’s not something that gets posted.

    I’ll update as often as I can. Feel free to submit topics anytime.

  44. tom godwin on January 20, 2007 1:13 pm
  45. For what it’s worth, I like it
    Nate.

  46. Nate on January 20, 2007 1:18 pm
  47. It’s worth more than you might think. Thanks Tom!

  48. Anonymous on January 20, 2007 2:45 pm
  49. the chief of police was seen outside smoking at the police station before the meeting started. that bartlomey character was at the meeting before it started. if he could make it before the meeting started the chief could of too. she did it to herself.

    the chief requested a hearing. she never requested a public hearing. read her letter as im sure she will show it to you.

    its the same people who show up to support carol each time. no more and no less.

    the charlotte on tv doesnt even pay taxes in town or volunteer for anything. how can she complain. check her record and you will see alot. she is just mad because her sister didnt get on the council seat.

  50. Anonymous on January 20, 2007 2:45 pm
  51. p.s. i tried to post on the eye but they wont post.

  52. Someone on January 20, 2007 5:32 pm
  53. I have to admit, it’s growing on me. I guess it’s just the change. I wasn’t prepared.

  54. Someone on January 20, 2007 5:33 pm
  55. What is 2:52 talking about? Who is Greenbeck?

  56. Anonymous on January 20, 2007 5:46 pm
  57. the old broad on the news who said people were being threatened. what a joke.

  58. Anonymous on January 20, 2007 8:08 pm
  59. I’ve asked this on the IEye several times but for some reason they won’t post it. It’s in regards to the following quote: “And don’t give us that BS about she was late for the meeting…Marks knew she was going to be late due to an interview regarding the on-going criminal investigation involving Officer Mike Brehmer and Tyler Coe.”

    So, I’m gonna post my question here:

    Once again, how do you know what the meeting Carol was in was about? How do you even know who was there? More importantly, WHY do you know? Last I knew, details of police investigations werern’t common knowledge. Has Carol been talking out of turn?

  60. Anonymous on January 20, 2007 8:09 pm
  61. are you silly anonymous. of course she talks out of turn and to her goons. nate wont talk bad about her though as he likes her.

  62. Anonymous on January 20, 2007 10:51 pm
  63. where u at nate?

  64. AnonymousAnonymous on January 20, 2007 10:55 pm
  65. I think you’ve got more people on this blog than the last already. Congrats.

  66. Nate Westre on January 20, 2007 10:59 pm
  67. Ruby’s, where else?

  68. Anonymous on January 20, 2007 11:23 pm
  69. nice of you to tell everyone in town.

  70. Buffy on January 22, 2007 9:34 am
  71. The new site is interesting! Yeah! Nice to let us know you were in town again this weekend.

  72. ew on January 22, 2007 4:16 pm
  73. I agree Nate, one of those first anonymous posts made no sense at all. I read it about 5 times and still had no idea. Somebody needs inform this person punctuation exists for a reason.

  74. Anonymous on January 22, 2007 4:18 pm
  75. you make no sense ew

  76. Anonymous on January 22, 2007 6:59 pm
  77. when will yah be back in town?

  78. Nate on January 22, 2007 7:14 pm
  79. I’ll be back as soon as I have $80,000 in my pocket. So it might be a while.

    Don’t worry 4:18, EW hasn’t made sense for as long as I’ve known him.

  80. Anonymous on January 22, 2007 7:18 pm
  81. January 20, 2:52. All those Wells Fargo listings. Wonder who on the Council works for Wells Fargo? Typical isn’t it. You don’t like the message so you try to discredit the messinger, right! Guess it’s hard to find the truth in your ramblings. I would think her sister is happy not to be associated with this council. Just ask Dick Cook.

  82. Anonymous on January 22, 2007 7:28 pm
  83. oh please

  84. Anonymous on January 22, 2007 7:28 pm
  85. Jan 22 @ 7:18,
    Actually, that info is all on the Iowa Courts online website. It has nothing to do with working at Wells Fargo. Sorry to burst your bubble.

  86. Anonymous on January 22, 2007 7:28 pm
  87. you have some great ambition to get 80 grand and come to stuart. better idea nate. take it make yourself a life outside of stuart. it would probably be better for your mental health.

  88. Nate on January 22, 2007 7:36 pm
  89. I’ve made a life outside of Stuart, but I think in the not-too-distant future it will be time to come home.

  90. Anonymous on January 22, 2007 7:53 pm
  91. can you loan me close to eighty grand? it would be nice. sounds like you are close to your goal. how close in months wise before you come back to stuart (home).?

  92. Anonymous on January 22, 2007 7:58 pm
  93. I think 7:53 means: How many months til you move home (Stuart)? One? 6? A year?

  94. Nate on January 22, 2007 7:59 pm
  95. Well, if I start saving now…and I save $1000 a month…I should be back in around 80 months. Donations are always welcome though.

  96. Anonymous on January 22, 2007 8:20 pm
  97. can i get a job where you work. if you are saving that much each month i think i want to come to overland.

  98. Nate on January 22, 2007 8:23 pm
  99. If you understand the concept of ‘buy low, sell high’ I think you have what it takes.

  100. Anonymous on January 22, 2007 9:39 pm
  101. 80 months = 6.7 years. You think that’s in the “not-too-distant future?”

  102. Nate on January 22, 2007 10:05 pm
  103. Yep.

  104. Anonymous on January 22, 2007 10:40 pm
  105. i think i will be dead by that time!

  106. Nate on January 22, 2007 10:43 pm
  107. Hang in there. It’ll be here sooner than you know it. Any donations will help!

  108. Anonymous on January 23, 2007 9:51 am
  109. Why don’t you shoot for $3000 a month. Then that would be 26.6 months which is a little over two years. You’d still be in your twenties when you move back.

  110. Anonymous on January 23, 2007 5:02 pm
  111. just make a donation.

  112. winnie the pooh on March 19, 2007 7:43 am
  113. WOW!! I like it!

  114. Master environment on October 19, 2007 3:00 pm
  115. What is morally wrong can never be advantageous, even when it enables you to make some gain that you believe to be to your advantage — Marcus Tullius Cicero

Name

Email

Website

Speak your mind

  • Visit my sponsor!

  • Advertise on this site